A brief introduction to Zionist male genital mutilation.

A Q and A with AI on male genital mutilation.

99 year-old Abram had a perfectly functional prepuce when God called him out in the desert day to make a deal. And what a deal that was. The Greater Israel for a small tip of penis.

Lets start at the very beginning. A time before any genital mutilation. When no baby boys were genitally mutilated. When no baby girls were genitally mutilated. A time when there was no such thing as genital mutilation of babies. Before anyone thought it would be a good idea to surgically interfere with their vulnerable, defenseless children’s genitalia.

Here is the questionnaire on the advent of male genital mutilation.

Q: Around 3,500 years ago, how many people on earth mutilated their children’s genitalia.
A: Zero. Circumcision, although being the oldest surgical procedure in human history, only appears as a form of genital mutilation inflicted on prisoners of war. A painful punishment.

Q: In the Christian tradition, how many Christians believed they should mutilate their babies genitals since the advent of Christianity less than 2,000 years ago.
A: Zero. At no time did the Christian leader class require babies be genitally mutilated.

Q: When did God first demand male genital mutilation.
A: Around 3,500 years ago when God made a covenant with Abram. As recorded in Genesis 15 in the Book of God. The Bible, originating from The Biblia in the original Greek version, that assembled 73 books written by many authors over more than 2,000 years. Eventually taking its recognizable form in the Koine Greek Gospel, appearing in the second century AD. Defined as a loose-knit, episodic narrative of the words and deeds of Jesus, not yet including details of his circumcision on the eighth day, culminating in his trial and short lived death and concluding with various reports of his post-resurrection appearances.

Q: Who was this Abram from the book of Genesis who spoke to God about the genital mutilation.
A: Abram, now known as Abraham, is the common Hebrew patriarch of the Abrahamic religions, including Judaism, Christianity, and Islam.

Q: So Abraham was the original Semite and all the tribes descended from Abraham are semitic people.
A: Yes. Ishmael, Abrahams first son is regarded as a prophet and the ancestor of the Ishmaelites. According to the Book of Genesis in the Bible, Ishmael had one daughter and twelve sons, the “twelve princes” mentioned in Genesis 17:20. In Islamic tradition, this gave rise to the “Twelve Tribes of Ishmael”, Arab tribes from which the early Muslims were descended. In Jewish tradition, the Twelve Tribes of Israel were descended from Abraham and his wife Sarah’s son, Isaac, via Isaac’s son Jacob. These traditions are accepted by both Islam and Judaism. Semitic DNA provenance begins down this Abrahamic line. Arab Muslims and Arab Jews, both equally the seed of Abraham when you go back far enough.

Q: Are all descendants of Abraham, from the three religions that followed, circumcised.
A: No. Christians do not have any history of circumcision. Muslims, average 99% circumcised. Jews globally are on average 91% circumcised.

Q: What was that covenant God made with Abraham, formerly Abram.
A: According to the Hebrew Bible, and later repeated in the Gospel, God spoke to Abraham at the site known as Mount Betarim. There the two negotiated a deal, entering into a legally binding land agreement called the covenant of the pieces. God told Abraham that his descendants would eventually inherit the Land of Israel, a territory later expanded to become Eretz Yisrael, the Greater Israel if Abraham agreed to circumcise himself and then everyone he could lay his hands on, introducing compulsory baby genital mutilation into Jewish culture.

Q: What did Abram, now Abraham, get in exchange for snipping off his penis tip.
A: God said, in exchange for becoming circumcised, Jews would one day inherit homes in Palestine for free. As well as other locations in the Greater Israel.

Q: A sweet deal. Did he offer the same to the other Arab Semitic tribe, the Muslim Arab Ishmaelites.
A: No. The tip snip for free land is an exclusively Jewish covenant at the Land Registry.

Q: When and why did Christians begin to circumcise.
A: In the 19th century, circumcision was touted as a treatment for excessive masturbation, seizures, epilepsy, and paraplegia. Adoption of the procedure by medical science was closely attached to religious belief. In 1894, a list of diseases that purportedly were cured by circumcision included eczema, elephantiasis, tuberculosis, enuresis, impotence, epilepsy, and hysteria. There was no legitimate medical reason for circumcision. By the mid-20th century, the sole medical grounds for performing circumcision on male infants was the pretext of phimosis when the prepuce was not retractable. Then medical science caught up. In 1949, Gairdner documented that the tight prepuce of infants gradually becomes retractile as childhood progresses. Thus, childhood circumcision solely for non-retractile prepuce is unnecessary. This is the foundation for modern anti-circumcision movements in which circumcision is male genital mutilation that is child abuse.

Q: How old was Abraham when he made this pact with God.
A: Abraham circumcised himself at the age of 99 years, before doing the same to all his sons and slaves. Starting the tradition of Jewish Circumcision in the promise of free land at a much later time.

Q: Was Jesus circumcised. According to the experts.
A: Catholics used to celebrate the first day of January, the 8th day after Christmas, as the Feast of the Circumcision. Because Jesus, being a Jew, was also circumcised on the eighth day of life.

Q: If God is perfect and his son is created in his image, why did God require his creation work to be modified by a man performing genital mutilation.
A: No one knows who was responsible for the decision to genitally mutilate the son of God.

Q: If we could identify this person who mutilated Jesus on his 8th day on Earth then would he be celebrated for defacing Gods creation, or not.
A: On one hand, God did incentivize all Jews to genitally mutilate their sons, by covenant with Abraham. On the other, God never makes mistakes. He put the foreskin, the prepuce, onto his perfect creation for a reason. Whether one aligns with the imperfect version of God who erred in designing the prepuce, or the perfect version of Hebrew mythology in which God created a covenant exchanging the Jewish foreskin for land in Palestine 3,000 years later, has troubled Theologians for centuries.

Q: Why exactly do Jews, Muslims and White Christian Americans circumcise in such high numbers. Over 90%.
A: Since many Muslims and Jews either do not know or do not necessarily accept religious beliefs associated with circumcision, cultural beliefs have been adopted to replace religious beliefs associated with circumcision and defend the practice. For example, Muslims and Jews reinforce circumcision by believing that all members of the group practice it. With this belief, Jews and Muslims put themselves under pressure to comply with social expectations to circumcise. It is a herd motivation. In the delusional effort to justify barbaric cruel child abusive behavior Jews and Muslims use claims of medical benefits to provide reassurance about the advisability of circumcision. These includes tropes of outrageous mendacity like, women prefer a circumcised man, less risk of AIDS, and many other health benefits.

Q: The first Americans who arrived in the Native American Land in 1620 were Christians. How many of them were circumcised.
A: Zero.

Q: When did the surge in circumcisions reach the Christian USA.
A: Circumcision only became a majority in the decades following WWII. Most WWII veterans would have been uncircumcised unless they were Jewish. The practice gained traction in the USA following the rise of Zionism post WW2.

Q: How many Christian Americans are circumcised now.
A: There has been a rise in circumcisions to an average 81% during the past decade. Whites (91%), Blacks (76%), and Hispanics (44%).

Q: Why is the US the only Christian Zionist nation to have the same circumcision rates among the white population as Zionist Israel.
A: This statistic is not a coincidence, that speaks to Zionist influence beginning with Theodore Herzl’s publication in 1896.

Q: Does Zionism promote the requirement to circumcise with the narrative of health advantages and other benefits that entirely disregard the medical facts.
A: There is strong evidence that circumcision is overwhelmingly painful and traumatic, with long term psychological consequences. Defending circumcision requires minimizing or dismissing the harm and producing overstated medical claims about protection from future harm. The ongoing denial requires the acceptance of false beliefs and misunderstandings of facts. These psychological factors affect professionals, members of religious groups and parents involved in the practice. Cultural conformity is a major force perpetuating non-religious circumcision, and to a greater degree, religious circumcision. The avoidance of guilt and the reluctance to acknowledge the mistake and all that that implies help to explain the tenacity with which the practice is defended.

Q: In Israel nearly all baby boys are circumcised. Be their parents ultra-Orthodox or totally secular Jews, it is by far the most common choice. Is that changing as Israeli’s learn the consequences of mutilating their children.
A: Yes. An increasing minority fear genitally mutilating their children is a form of physical abuse with long term psychological consequences for the victims.

Q: Is there a connection between Zionism in Christian America, and the prevalence of circumcision among white American Christians.
A: The advent of Christian Zionism promoting Zionist ideology in the USA follows the same timeline as the increase in circumcision.

Q: Is it more likely that a circumcised Christian American will be a Zionist, consciously, or unconsciously, than a Christian who is not circumcised.
A: Yes.

Q: Is that the motivation the Zionist entity had in mind when they targeted the US institutional sectors including Health, Education, Religion and Government with a highly funded campaign to normalize and popularize circumcision in a Christian culture with no interest in mutilating their own children.
A: Yes.

Q: Is the average American Christian more likely to place Zionist interest above their Christian ideology if they are circumcised.
A: Using the example of little children. Christian ideology is very clear. Thou Shalt not murder the little children. Thou shalt not starve the little children to skeletal death. And thou shalt definitely not abominate on my very clear message of love and kindness. Jesus is widely reported to have said. Yet, a majority of Americans who are circumcised and who identify as Christians, openly support a Zionist government who openly mass starve and conspire to mass murder children by the million.

Q: In numerical terms, how many of those actively engaged in genocide at this time, either as triggermen in the Occupied regions, or among the Zionist leader class driving the genocide, are circumcised.
A: More than 90%.

Q: Is there any connection between Zionist ideology recruiting new supplicants from birth using circumcision, and the horrific atrocities associated with Zionist ideology as a cult of mass child murder.
A: That question is best answered using a sample of 100 white Christian Americans who are circumcised, and 100 white Christian Americans who are not circumcised.
99% of the circumcised White Christian American sample say there is no connection between being circumcised and supporting genocide, actively or passively. The converse appears in the uncircumcised White Christian American sample, 100% of whom recognize the hand of the Zionist entity in the American Christian fixation with Zionism and all that Zionism represents.

Q: Members of the British royal family have been circumcised for at least two generations. Who circumcised King Charles.
A: The London Jewish community’s official Mohel Jacob Snowman performed the surgery on baby Prince Charles in Buckingham Palace, eight days after his 1948 birth. Princes Andrew and Edward were also circumcised by the same Mohel.

Q: Did a Brooklyn baby who contracted herpes after a metzitzah b’peh, the ritual circumcision in which a grown man sucks on the babies penis to remove the blood from the surgery, die.
A: Yes. In a metzitzah b’peh a circumcision practitioner, or mohel, removes the foreskin from the baby’s penis then, with his mouth sucks the blood from the incision to cleanse the wound. This unhygienic version of Judaism claims to be a legitimate 5,000-year-old religious practice by which American children can find their little bleeding penis’s in a grown mans mouth with no protection from the law or the child protection services. In New York, In 2003 and 2004, three babies, including a set of twins, were infected with Type 1 herpes after a mohel sucked on bleeding baby penis. One of those infected boy’s died. The mohel who performed the procedures, Yitzchok Fischer, tested positive for Herpes and was later banned from doing his circumcision work. Yitzchok Fischer refused to submit to a DNA test to determine if he is a match to the viruses found in the babies who became ill after he was ordered to stop sucking on baby penis. In 2017 the New York Daily news headline reads: New York City knew about dangerous Jewish circumcision ritual for years but didn’t warn parents until after baby’s death. To this day American children whose parents see fit to genitally mutilate their babies in this way are free to do so.

Q: Can you wrap it up on a happier note please.
A: Yes. For a lighthearted end to this piece about pieces I was going to list how many US presidents were circumcised. (None.) So, I then searched “Is Lifelong Zionist Joe Biden circumcised” and here’s what the results showed. This spoof page from 2021 that made me laugh.

A less tragic ending to this reminder of a tragic blight on humanity. One of the worst crimes against humanity ever contrived.

When generations of people mutilated their own babies long after the evidence of what genital mutilation does to the victims was available.

Leading By Example: President Biden Will Get Circumcised On Live Television To Prove To Americans That It’s Safe

“There are numerous health benefits to cutting the hood of skin off of your penis, and I urge any Americans who may have reservations about having this done to tune in Wednesday and watch me prove that there’s truly nothing to worry about,” said Biden in the press release. “My administration believes in science, and science says that circumcision is completely safe. It also improves the appearance of one’s penis and allows one to engage in sexual intercourse with a new partner without first having to offer an awkward caveat about unsightly excess skin shrouding the glans.”

Extracts from by book HALF THE STORY. Amazon, paperback, Hardcover and Kindle. And also on Audible, narrated by Andrew Brel.